Micro mobility as a Service
for Transportation Vulnerables

Period
2020.10. - 2021. 01.
Role
UX Researcher
Contribution
80%
Company
School project (Funded)

“ What should be considered when designing a MaSS for the vulnerable transportation users? ”

Overview

The micro mobility service targets vulnerable individuals who lack access to public transportation. To enhance their social participation and autonomy and reduce blind spots in transportation welfare, the hardware and software of the service should be designed to be user-friendly for vulnerable populations.

1. Goals

To identify requirements for designing the service

2. Research Design & Process

①  Recruiting
Participants Screener
  • 10 males/ females aged 60-80
  • Having no significant restrictions on communication or physical activity
  • Occasional use of sedentary mobility
  • Able to walk on their own
② Pre-interview
Methods
  • Structured interview
Questionnaire
  • Demography
    : Sex, Age, Residential area
Questionnaire (TBC)
  • Lifestyle: Frequency/ Distance/ Purpose/ Time of going out, Transportation/ Price, Digital Literacy
  • Previous experiences with powered mobility scooters: degree of stability/comfortableness (7-point scale), purpose
  • Impressions on AngGo: Size, color, etc. 
①  Recruiting
Participants Screener
  • 10 male/ Female age 60 ~ 80
  • No significant restrictions on expression or physical activity
  • Occasional use of sedentary mobility
  • Able to walk on their own
② Pre-interview
Methods
  • Structured interview
Questionnaire
  • Demography
    : Sex, Age, Residential area
  • Lifestyle
    : Frequency/ Distance/ Purpose/ Time of going out, Transportation/ Price, Digital Literacy
  • Previous experiences in powered mobility scooters
    : Stability/ Comfortableness (7-point sclae), Purpose 
  • Impressions on AngGo
    : Size, color, etc. 
③ Riding AngGo
* AngGo

: A sedentary micro mobility developed by UNIST DECS lab
Methods
  • Observation
Observation checklist
  • When/ why participants feel fear/ comfortable
  • Familiarity with methods of controlling the mobility device (e.g. handlebars, joystick, buttons) and comfort level with each method
④ Post-interview
Methods
  • Semi-structured interview
Questionnaire
  • Satisfaction: Satisfaction, comparison to powered mobility scooters, complaints
  • A sense of control: Opinions on controlling methods
  • Stability: Degree of stability/ comfortableness (7-point scale),
    preference compared to walking
  • Hardware design: General design, color, seat, controller, size
⑤  Warp-up
  • Consent to Provide Personal Information
  • Incentives

3. Key Findings

1. Use Case
City
  • To travel short distance which is too short ride for public transportation or a car
Countryside
  • To travel long distance, get help with walking
2. Hardware requirements
Young & positive look
  • Vulnerable individuals do not want to project an image of being old or weak in order to avoid prejudice.
Speed Control
  • Speed should be adjustable.
  • Controlling methods should be intuitive and comfortable.
Backrest
  • Backrest increases the feeling of stability
Steering
  • People who have experience in driving preferred steering as a controlling method, as it is familiar.
3. Service requirements
Card Tagging
  • The elderly are not comfortable using mobile devices to rent a micro-mobility service. Card tagging is a more intuitive method for them.
Parking
  • City - Unrestricted parking, as the main use case is short travel
  • Countryside - Designated area such as hub, as the main use case is long travel.

3. Limitations

Restricted Area (Ulsan)
  • All participants were residents in Ulsan
  • The result may be different in the city having different environment 
Imbalanced Samples 
  • Out of 10, 6 participants were in their 60s. 
  • Based on our IDI sessions, we found that the elderly perceive the age groups of 60s and 70s as different. Therefore, if we want to include individuals aged 70s to 80s in our target segment, further research would be required to better understand the needs and preferences of this age group.
Absence of Beta-service
  • Due to financial limitations, we were unable to deploy the mobilities. It is possible that unexpected problems could arise if they were deployed in real-world situations.

Other projects